top of page

Demystifying India’s School Boards (Part 6): Myth vs. Reality

  • Writer: Rohit Malekar
    Rohit Malekar
  • Sep 24
  • 3 min read

Over the past five parts, we’ve looked closely at CBSE, ICSE, IB, Cambridge, and State Boards — what they emphasize, what they cost, how easy they are to switch, and the trade-offs parents need to weigh.


But beyond the facts and figures, there’s another layer parents constantly wrestle with: the myths. In WhatsApp groups, PTA meetings, or playground conversations, sweeping claims about school boards often take on a life of their own. “IB guarantees foreign admissions,” “State boards are useless,” “ICSE is impossible.” These myths shape parental anxiety more than brochures ever could.


In this final part, let’s shine a light on the most common myths and bust them with reality.


Myth 1: “IB guarantees foreign college admissions.”

Reality: No school board can guarantee college admission; not in India, not abroad. It’s true that the IB Diploma is widely respected by overseas universities, and IB students often have strong resumes with research projects and extracurriculars. But admissions still depend on the student’s performance, essays, and profile.


Plenty of CBSE and ICSE students make it into Ivy League and UK universities. Admissions officers look at what you did with your opportunities, not the board name. In fact, all mainstream Indian boards are recognized by universities abroad; you may need transcripts or equivalence certificates, but they are accepted.


So while IB can give skills that help abroad, it’s not a golden ticket. Your child can study in a state or national board school and still reach Harvard or Oxford with the right achievements.


Myth 2: “State Boards are outdated and useless.”

Reality: State boards may not have the glamour of an international curriculum, but “useless” is far from true. They educate the majority of Indian children. Many have been updating syllabi to include English, computer studies, and modern teaching aids.


Yes, the approach can be traditional, but it builds foundational knowledge. And not every family’s goal is a foreign university or IIT. For many, education itself (literacy, math skills, and stable jobs) is the goal, and state boards provide that reliably.


They are also attuned to local needs: a West Bengal student might read Rabindranath Tagore in depth, or a Tamil Nadu student might learn about local history often skipped in national curricula. And let’s not forget: countless doctors, engineers, and artists began in state board schools.

Outdated? It varies. Useless? Absolutely not.


Myth 3: “ICSE is impossibly hard, and CBSE is the easy board.”

Reality: ICSE has a reputation for a heavier syllabus, but “hard” or “easy” depends entirely on the child. Kids who love reading and research may enjoy ICSE’s projects and descriptive answers. Those who prefer structured, concise exam prep may find CBSE more manageable.


The truth is, both have demanding board exams in Class 10 and 12. Scoring high marks in either requires clarity of concepts. The real difference lies in style:

  • ICSE: more subjects, project work, descriptive answers.

  • CBSE: more streamlined, focused on core content and standardized testing.


So don’t pick based on labels like “harder” or “easier.” Pick based on your child’s learning style.


Myth 4: “International boards (IB/Cambridge) are only for rich kids or those moving abroad.”

Reality: It’s true that IB and Cambridge are expensive and often chosen by globally mobile families. But they’re not onlyfor them. Many parents choose these boards for the teaching style (inquiry, exploration, global outlook) even if they plan to stay in India.


And going abroad for college does not require IB or Cambridge. Universities abroad accept Indian board students all the time. Conversely, IB and Cambridge students also pursue higher education in India, though sometimes with extra paperwork for equivalence.


So the idea that they’re “only for rich kids” is a stereotype. Scholarships and financial aid are also widening access in some schools. It’s about priorities and resources, not just privilege.


Beyond the Myths

There are countless more:

  • “Only board X kids crack the UPSC.”

  • “Switching boards ruins a child’s future.”

  • “Marks are easier in board Y.”


The reality almost always lies in the middle. No board guarantees success or failure. A motivated student can thrive anywhere, and a disengaged student can struggle even in the “best” school.


Boards are frameworks, not fate. As Dr. Maya Pillai of TISS puts it: The board is a tool, not the master.” It’s about how your child uses that tool and how schools, teachers, and parents nurture them along the way.


Your Turn: Add Your Voice

As we wrap up this 6-part series, we know one thing for certain: the myths will keep swirling unless parents, teachers, and students share real stories. At SchoolDoor, we’re building a citizen-led guide where lived experiences matter more than brochures or playground rumors.


👉 Join the SchoolDoor Early Circle and be part of shaping India’s first parent-powered school review platform. Share your myth-busting story: What did you believe before choosing a board? What turned out differently?

Comments


bottom of page